Showing posts with label Case Studies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Case Studies. Show all posts

Friday, 11 December 2015

Case Study - Interview With Protestant Preacher Dr John Revill

Having re-read the latest draft of my essay, I realise that my reference to an episode of the Simpsons is, while very appropriate, not very academic. I feel the point needs to be backed by a more academic source. My grandad, Dr John Revill, has been a Christian preacher for the majority of his life, and seemed like a good person to talk too about this. The interview went as follows:

*Interview starts by me showing Dr Revill the first 13 minutes and 30 seconds of The Simpsons, Series 2, Episode 13: Homer vs Lisa and the 8th Commandment.

Q: How long have you been a Doctor?

A: 53 Years.

Q: And how long have you been a protestant preacher?

A: A bit longer, 59 years.

Q: If you were Reverend Lovejoy having the conversation with Lisa Simpson, what would your advice to her have been?

A: Certainly is not to watch the forbidden fruit as it were, but then to tell her farther that he ought not to be involved as he may get into trouble with the law.

Q: Is this not going against the fifth commandment?

A: Not really, no. She’s still respecting her father, and he ought to set an example as a father not to encourage his family to use methods of stealing which were dubious.

Q: So does this mean that, on occasion, there are situations where any rule, even one of the ten commandments, will find an exception?

A: Yes. The ten commandments have to be taken together as a whole and sometimes one of them is much more relevant than the others, meaning that sometimes you can not obey one of the commandments without breaking one of the others. We call this situational ethics, so stealing a loaf of bread for someone who’s starving isn’t necessarily wrong.

Q: You said something to me the other day about the war with Isis, and how you don’t believe in war, but you believe in peace, and you believe in defending innocent people. In defending innocent people in this instance, to some extent there’s a case of accepting war. Does this mean that you don’t think moral rules should have some wiggle room in them?

A: Yes, this is situational ethics.

Friday, 6 November 2015

Case Study Research - Advertising Through Physical and Metaphysical Promises

Advertising generally tries to sell things through one of two ways, through promises of making your life physically better such as "this product will help you succeed in your goals", or through making metaphysical promises such as "this product will make you a happier person".

The Citroen C4 dancing car advert is an example of the latter. The contents of the avert is blatantly fictional, so you're not getting any physical promises from the advert. Instead, the advert is saying "this car is fun, it'll make your life more fun", a metaphysical promise. It doesn't actually tell you anything about the car, and so isn't really successful in terms of it's communication with the audience about the cars selling points.



A recent advert for the Toyota Auris is an example of the opposite. It plays on the fact that other car adverts tend to offer metaphysical speculations or subjective thoughts, and instead offers factual positives about the car, making the communication much clearer and more successful. Rather than "this car is fun, it'll make your life more fun", it's saying "this car is practical and will make driving easier for you", which is generally a much more powerful message when trying to sell a car.



This is applicable to most products. Coca-Cola's One World, One Game campaign that ran alongside the 2014 FIFA World Cup is another example of selling through metaphysical promises. The advert communicates very little about the product, instead it says "by buying Coca-Cola, you're helping people in poverty", which while it's a good message, isn't what's in the forefront of most consumers minds when buying a drink. It's also a somewhat hypocritical message given the recent tax problems the Coca-Cola company has had.




When you compare this to Lucozade's Fuel to Rule campaign the differences in the communication are similar to those in the car advert. Rather than selling the product on a metaphysical feeling of 'goodness', it's being sold on self-empowerment, communicating messages like "this drink makes you a more capable athlete", and so gives the consumer a physical reason to buy the drink.



Adverts such as these suggest that the most successful forms of communication are done through physical promises, which align with Danto's suggestion that when considered in the context of the will to power;

"Happiness, as far as it is relevant, is not separable from the struggle for power, for pleasure is simply the conscious reflection of the ascendancy of our strength"

This suggests that adverts that offer something physical like the Lucozade and Toyota ones are not only more successful in their communication, but also more likely to sell a product because happiness is found in physical things like power and success, not metaphysical ones. 

Sources

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dilUbkP-PI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WI9wBrscUQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMed07FEDEg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTNe4pTkg8g
http://www.taxjusticeblog.org/archive/2015/09/its_not_the_real_thing_coca-co.php#.Vjx96K7hB0s
DANTO, A. C. (1980). Nietzsche as Philosopher. Chichester: Columbia University Press.

Thursday, 5 November 2015

Case Study Research - Applications of Modernist Design and Pastiche

There are some fields of design that lend themselves towards modernist design more than others, and these are generally the sort of "cultural projects" referred to by the First Things First Manifesto. The general gist of the list of examples in both the 1964 and 2000 Manifesto's are the same, so the inclusion of street signs in the original would suggest that street signs would also be considered a cultural project by the 2000 edition. The UK's road signs were designed in 1963 by Jock Kinneir and Margaret Calvert. They kept the signs as simple as possible to make the message of each individual sign as clear as possible. The aesthetic this created was a modernist one, which goes a long way to explain why the system doesn't look out of place today.










Moscow Sans is the typeface and set of pictograms designed for the transport systems in Moscow in early 2015 by A2SWHK and Margaret Calvert. Despite the cultural differences between the UK 50 years ago and present day Moscow, the typefaces, pictograms, and the application of Moscow Sans is, like the UK road signs, modernist. The fact that both are successful is an indication that signage in general needs to be modernist to some extent to work successfully. On top of this, the fact that Margaret Calvert, now approaching 80 years old, is still involved in this element of design 52 years on from when she worked on the British system, is somewhat of an indication of Michael Bierut's implied suggestion that this sort of work is only done by a narrow selection of designers;

"Most of the thirty-five signatories are names that will be unfamiliar to the average rank-and-file american graphic designer. Many of them built their reputations by doing “cultural” work on the fringes of commercial graphic design practice as critics, curators, and academics. As designers, their clients generally have been institutions like museums and publishers, rather than manufacturers of nasty things like triple-edged razors, cigarettes, and cereal." 

This is somewhat contradictory to the idea making communication free and accessible to everyone as suggested in the 2000 Manifesto. 














On the opposite side of this coin there is the fact that there are some fields of design where modernism isn't appropriate. The extreme modernism of the Morrisons Savers range, which is commercial embodiment of accessibility, is somewhat reminiscent of Michael Bierut's invitations for the International Design Centre, arguably a 'cultural project'.





















However, the Morrisons Savers design is clearly unsuitable for products such as Vodka and Whisky, which rely on the connotations of their branding to make them desirable. Products such as these now have their own connotations, such as poverty, desperation, and alcoholism, because of their low price, which is made possible because of the lack of commercial activity behind the product. Such connotations stop people form buying the products more often than not, making the design unsuitable.

 

When the Morrisons Savers brand of Vodka and Whisky are compared with Smirnoff and Jack Daniels respectively, the difference in connotations are clear. The use of pastiche in the branding provides connotations of history, power, and success, which, when combined with the more refined and aesthetically pleasing visuals make it a much more desirable product, and therefore the branding is more successful, and crucially, more skilful.

 

Pastiche is also useful in cultural design though, as it's ability to appropriate historical messages and tone help spread a message. A good example of this is the Guerrilla Girls reappropriating their own poster design, in doing so they're using the historical context of the 1989 version to suggest to problem raised in the 2014 version is outdated, while still using the iconic design of the original poster. 












Pastiche can even be applied to the technique behind a design as opposed to the visuals of it. This placard was used in a protest rally against Putin's anti-gay rights policies in Moscow early 2015, and was the first time the LBGT flag was used in the protests. The text reads "We won’t give it to Putin a third time", and the obvious home-made look of the placard brings with it connotations of innocence, which isn't something you'd necessarily associate with the LGBT flag, which normally is about pride and passion. The innocence allows a much more emotional connection than a more professionally made placard, which makes it successful.




















These examples show how pastiche can be used effectively on all sorts of projects, whereas modernism tends to be a bit more discriminative as to what projects are suitable. 

Sources

http://www.eyemagazine.com/feature/article/the-way-ahead
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15990443
http://www.itsnicethat.com/articles/a2swhk-moscow
http://www.aiga.org/medalist-michaelbierut/
http://www.vam.ac.uk/blog/section/disobedient-objects
https://groceries.morrisons.com/webshop/startWebshop.do 
BIERUT, M. (2007). 79 Short Essays on Design. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

Wednesday, 4 November 2015

Case Study Research - Edenspiekermann and MetaDesign

Edenspiekermann and MetaDesign are design agencies heavily influenced by Erik Spiekermann, one of the most well-known and successful signatories of the 2000 First Things First Manifesto.

The below images are work done by offices of Edenspiekermann in Berlin, Singapore, and Amesterdam for Optivo, The City of Amsterdam, and Utrecht City Theatre respectively. Their similar aesthetics despite their different head designers are examples of how modernist design tends to look very similar and easily replicated.

Eddie Pillers description summary of a modernist lifestyle is “an aphorism for clean living under difficult circumstances”, which, if extended into Graphic Design would suggest that Edenspeikermann have allowed, to some extend, modernist principles to become more important that result of following the principles. 

If this is the case then you would expect Spiekermann himself to be very committed to the other principles of the 2000 First Things First Manifesto, such as the opposition of commercialist culture. Despite this, MetaDesign, a company founded by Spiekermann himself, have clients including Bosch, Volkswagen, Raiffeisen, Audi, Karcher, Coca-Cola, Siemens, and Lacoste.

This is a practical example of how First Things First's ideology is nothing more than an ideology, it's impossible to work in practice because of how capitalism works, which is undermining of the anti-capitalist message set by the 2000 First Things First Manifesto.

Optivo (Link)



 

City of Amsterdam (Link)



















Utrecht City Theatre (Link)



















Sources

http://www.edenspiekermann.com/
http://sanfrancisco.metadesign.com/
https://vimeo.com/52431977

Friday, 23 October 2015

Case Study Research - The Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Act 2002

The list of products that the 2000 First Things First Manifesto cites as being a waste of designers time contains cigarettes. Of all the products they listed, cigarettes are the only ones which cause direct harm to consumers, making them arguably the best example of work that designers should outlaw.

The TA&P Act 2002 was introduced by the UK Government in order to try and reduce numbers of people smoking, in order to save money on the NHS over a long period of time. The act was the catalyst for further measures to be introduced that severely limit where, when and how tobacco companies are allowed to advertise their products.

This logically meant that all tobacco companies had to cut down the amount of advertising they were doing, but because all the companies were doing this, they existed in a market that had the same level competitiveness as beforehand, meaning that all the companies were saving large amounts of money from their advertising budgets.

It is often suggested the primary function of tobacco advertising is to get consumers to switch their favoured brand rather than to attract first time smokers, as smoking is already embed within our society. If this is the case, then roughly the same number of people will be smoking, but at much less cost to the tobacco companies. A report by the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public health in 2011 said that; 

"The relatively new restrictions in Canada, the United States, and the UK are promising steps toward the continued reduction of influence that tobacco companies have on smokers. However, additional bans/more stringent implementation of existing bans are especially needed on store advertisements and special price offers"

Which would suggest that it's not the clever branding or advertising methods that are controlling the consumers as the 2000 First Things First Manifesto suggests, but it's more to do with the price it's sold at.

This is an example of how a reduction in the commercial competition in a particular consumer area as is suggested by the 2000 First Things First Manifesto can cause no change in the consumerist attitude of the buyers of the product, but in fact benefit the commercial organisations that produce the products.

Sources

http://www.politics.co.uk/reference/tobacco-advertising
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3084464/